Showing posts with label CSW59. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CSW59. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 April 2015

AWOL

You may have noticed that in the last few weeks we haven't been updating the blog as frequently as we like to! 

Unfortunately the reality of exams have hit and with less than a month to go we are getting our heads down and revising every other second we have.

However, the seconds which aren't being spent revising have been spent organising, tweeting, emailing, setting up, collaborating and creating a lot a lot of exciting plans which we are looking forward to sharing with you very soon!

Since we've been back we've been doing lots of assemblies, meetings, talks and feedback sessions about what we got up to and the learning and issues we want to share and take forward. 

In the mean time before we're able to share the events and programs in the pipeline, as well as get back to uploading our thoughts and blog rants (of which we have scribbled down as drafts excessive amounts) we thought we'd upload a few pictures of our time in New York!


YWCA Young Women and Girls' Forum
Selfie with Lopa Banerjee
(Head of Civil Society section of UN Women)




IWD2015 March to Times Square
Hillary Clinton at the UN Women Event, CSW59



The only whole-group picture! with Annette, Co-Chair of NAWO





Friday, 27 March 2015

Speech #2: Equality: A Universal Right, Annie Thomas

Annie Thomas

'My Vision for the Future of Equality in Volatile Areas'

BASIRA's event in the Baha'i International Center, CSW59 New York

No harmful religious, cultural or social practice can be allowed to supercede human rights. I have drawn on my experiences as a young girl from the UK and some areas within BASIRA's Middle East and North Africa region to propose what I believe must be the path forward, towards true gender equality.

The experience of CSW was utterly incredible, this is how I summed it up to Humans of CSW59:



Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Speech #1: How to Get People's Voices Heard and Heeded for Gender Equality, Gemma Welsh

Gemma Welsh

'Looking to the future of Institutional Mechanisms'


To see a transcript, click here
Firstly, what actually are "Institutional Mechanisms"?
Twenty years ago, at the World Conference on Women in Beijing, 189 countries made a commitment to reach gender equality; a 12-part framework called the Beijing Declaration.
The 8th critical area of the Declaration (or Platform for Action) was "Institutional Mechanisms".
This is a fancy name for a body funded by government, to work independently with government and civil society (charities, academia, business - not government basically) in order to make sure that governments are and can do their best to achieve a gender-equal world. A national institutional mechanism's job is to consult people about their lives, consult civil society about their expertise, and work with and advise their government. This includes making sure that a country's laws and policies don't unfairly affect groups of people based on their gender.

Things which may not appear to be discriminatory may in fact impact groups of people differently when they're implemented. 
  • For instance, women may be able to own a property under a country's legislation. However, in practice, if in that country a woman is not able to take out a bank loan, that would mean that realistically she's unlikely to be able to buy a house, and therefore the law about property-ownership is not going to be of any use. 
This is why it's important to have a body in place to check for any gaps or any hidden or unintended implications. It is shocking that barely any countries in the world have effective national mechanisms, despite the 20 years that have passed since they internationally and legally committed to doing so!
For me, this is because that barely any people know about Beijing, or are incredibly passionate about institutional mechanisms - I mean the name doesn't exactly inspire passion does it? But, without these essential parts in place, progress to change things which are embedded into our lives: the pay gap; stereotypes; workplace and academic bias; harassment etc...) cannot happen. 

All over the world, people raise their voices in attempts to call for change, however in many parts of the world it is dangerous for people to fight exercise these rights. And it is legally the job of the 186 countries who have signed up to Beijing to make sure they are making every effort to ensure that people (at least with regards to gender equality), don't have to.
Just in the UK, the average woman works 1 in every 6 working days free compared to the average man; men are three times more likely to end their own lives than a woman; and 1 in 3 girls will experience unwanted sexual touching in school.
Worldwide, 1 in 3 women experiences sexual abuse; the equivalent of 5 jumbo jets full of women die in labour every day, in majority from very preventable reasons; and there are 107 million women and girls missing from the world due to gender discrimination: more than all of the men who died in all the conflicts in the 20th Century. 

Clearly there are vast inequalities to be eradicated, not just by responses but also through prevention, and areas such as policies and lawmaking are key to this. 

As such, I called for everyone at CSW59, and call for everyone who reads this to consider how they can add their voice and show their governments they care about gender equality. 

Friday, 20 February 2015

Women in decision-making - what the Charlie Hebdo march photoshopping really showed us

Read the full article here
A HuffPost review - Annie Thomas

           This is a really interesting article. These publications were released following the Charlie Hebdo tragedy, and focus on the political identities featured in the Paris march. 

           Moving past the political elements of the separate publishers’ decisions to release the images, the pictures alone highlight the absence of female political leaders in governments and decision-making roles today.
           The troubling reality of the unequal and low representation of women is shown brutally in the first image, and truly highlights the problems faced by professional women in a male-dominated society.

           However, the controversial act of the HaMevaser Israeli newspaper cutting out the women from the photograph seems only to have drawn attention to the women’s cause, in contrast to what its image would have purported, that NO women have a role to play in federal legislation within governments.

           The satirical images that follow, in particular the one showing the ‘Million Merkel March’ is, in a feminist’s eyes, hyperbolic genius in protest to these narrow-minded newspapers, and fits the purpose of gaining ever-increasing support for the advancement of women’s professional and political involvement at higher levels.

           If you have a chance to read it, it’s an interesting visualisation of where women stand internationally in decision-making positions, and also gives an insight into different media’s interpretations on the roles of women to boot.